LETTER
TO STAFF, PARENTS & COMMUNITY
(28-Feb-2003)
TO: Board of Trustees, Staff & Community
FROM: BILL LEVINSON
DATE: February 28, 2003
SUBJECT: Fiscal Update
FISCAL CRISIS UPDATE: No official
action has taken place in Sacramento since the Board’s
last meeting on February 25. However, there has been
some positive movement on the political side.
Current 2002-2003 School Year: The
Governor and legislature remain deadlocked. The impact
of the recall effort is as yet unknown. The unofficial
deadline for making cuts to this year’s State
budget is March 31. The key obstacles for approval are
the legal issues surrounding the implementation of the
Vehicle License Fee restoration (to the previous 2%
of the value of a vehicle — currently .65%). Reminder:
If the cuts aren’t made this year, more expenditure
reductions will be needed next year.
2003-2004 Budget Year Proposals: There
is still no official movement in Sacramento on the basic
aid related issues — the loss of the $120 per
student basic aid allocation and the recapture of local
property tax revenues in excess of a district’s
revenue limit remain in play. If these provisions are
implemented next year, the District will lose about
$7.0 million in revenues, resulting in a projected budget
deficit of $6.6 million.
Complicating matters further, is a proposal by the
non-partisan Legislative Analyst Office to freeze the
property tax revenues of basic aid districts at the
2000-2001 level. This revenue freeze would remain in
place until such time as a district’s revenue
from the state determined revenue limit exceeds the
2000-2001 property tax limit. At that point, the district
would become a revenue limit district.
Under this scenario the District would lose $2.6 million
in revenues, resulting in a projected budget deficit
of $2.6 million. While not as extreme as the Governor’s
proposal, it is entirely unacceptable. It results in
a leveling down and the use of local property tax revenues
for non-education expenditures. It is another route
to the “slippery slope” of local property
tax confiscation.
School Services of California has provided a revised
estimate of what our “fair share” revenue
reduction would be if basic aid districts are treated
the same as revenue limit districts. Under this scenario,
the District would lose the $120 per ADA basic aid allocation
and the loss of an additional $250 per student (in some
manner as yet unidentified). The total impact of this
scenario is a loss of $1.3 million in revenues resulting
in a projected deficit of about $917,000 (but no property
tax recapture).
The information above reinforces how important it is
for the District, staff, parents, and students to continue
all efforts to limit our revenue reduction for the 2003-2004
school year to our “fair share.” Anything
more than that is unfair and will have a disastrous
impact on our program for kids and support for staff.
Political Environment: On Wednesday
morning, February 26, seven Marin County basic aid district
superintendents (including our Board Chair, Susan Schmidt)
met with Senator Burton in Sacramento to inform him
of the extreme impact of the Governor’s and Legislative
Analyst’s proposals. We asked the Senator to work
with the Governor to have him remove these proposals
from consideration prior to March 15, so basic aid districts
would not have to issue notices of possible layoff to
certificated staff (teachers and administrators). He
said he would attempt to do so.
Later in the morning, we attended the state-wide meeting
of all basic aid districts where we received an update
on the political issues from Bob Blattner (School Services),
the basic aid districts’ top lobbyist. During
the basic aid district meeting, Assemblyman Joe Simitian
(Palo Alto) and Assemblyman Joe Nation (Marin) addressed
the group. Both received standing ovations for their
leadership on behalf of basic aid districts. On Wednesday
night, Assemblyman Nation spoke to the Marin County
Superintendents and Trustees and reiterated his support
of basic aid districts.
The key messages include:
- The state-wide political efforts of the fifty or
so basic aid districts are having a substantial impact
in Sacramento. Thirty-two members of the assembly
signed a letter sponsored by Assemblyman Simitian
(including our Assemblyman, Joe Nation) criticizing
the basic aid proposal and asking the Governor to
rescind the proposal. In addition, three members of
the assembly, including Joe Nation, informed the Governor
that they would not vote for a State budget that included
any provisions taking away local property tax dollars
from basic aid districts.
- Education Secretary Kerry Mazzoni (former Novato
trustee) has acknowledged the basic aid proposals
have “gone too far” but that basic aid
districts needed to “share the burden”
(go to www.bayarea.com/mld/mercurynews/
for the full report). Please note:
Secretary of Education Mazzoni will be speaking to
Marin County on Thursday evening, March 6, at 7:00pm
in the San Rafael High School auditorium.
- Next year, basic aid districts should assume that
our “fair share” will mean the loss of
the $120 basic aid allocation as well as an additional
$250 per student. At this time, there’s no understanding
as to how the $250 would be captured from basic aid
districts. Further, this amount could increase/decrease
depending on whether or not the current year budget
reductions are approved and the state of California’s
economy by the Governor’s May Revise report.
- While it’s possible that the Governor might
rescind the basic aid property tax proposal, that
action is unlikely to occur prior to the statutory
May 17 “May Revise” report (although there’s
an assumption that basic aid districts would be notified
of the Governor’s intent prior to May 15 to
avoid final Reduction In Force notices for certificated
staff).
- Palo Alto Unified is working with legal counsel
to develop a consortium of basic aid districts to
review the possibility of taking legal action to prevent
any taking of property taxes (the Tam Board will consider
joining this consortium at their March 4th meeting).
- Districts were encouraged to prepare for a wide
range of possibilities, from a “fair share”
loss of revenues to the 85% loss of property taxes.
Each district would make budgetary decisions based
on local circumstances, including size of reserves,
degree of revenue loss, etc. Almost every district
indicated the need for some level of layoff notification
for certificated and classified staff.
- Basic Aid districts must assume that the fiscal
challenges facing us will not be resolved in the immediate
future. Final resolution will not occur until the
legislature passes a budget and the Governor signs
it. Nobody has any idea when this will occur. This
will have an extremely negative impact on high schools,
where re-staffing schools and rescheduling massive
numbers of students becomes problematic after June.
- Every basic aid district must continue efforts
to influence their local legislators. Both Nation
and Burton asked superintendents to have their communities
continue sending letters (Nation indicates that he
receives about 400 budget related letters each day),
but to focus the letter writing on the Governor’s
office. Go to the
sample letter and key
contacts addresses if you haven’t already
mailed your letters.
Planning for the 2003-2004 School Year Budget:
The administration’s recommendation to the Board
remains the same:
The District must be prepared to address a projected
budget deficit ranging from $.9 million to $6.6 million.
If the District loses $7,000,000 in basic aid revenues,
the recommendation is for the Board to platform down
expenditures and the impact on students and staff by
using some portion of the District’s General Fund
Reserve to balance the 2003-2004 budget. Further, the
recommendation is to go to the voters a year early and
seek a renewal of the parcel tax, scheduled to expire
on 6/30/05, with an increase sufficient to restore key
components in our program lost due to budget reductions.
If the District loses our “fair share”
only, about $1.3 million, the administration’s
recommendation is to make the expenditure reductions
needed to balance our budget, maintain our program for
students, and provide support for staff. Please note:
these reductions could result in the loss of staff positions.
And, the District must plan for losing between the
$1.3 million “fair share” and the full $7.0
million amount. This will require setting priorities
for reductions and restorations, once the State budget
is approved.
AT THE 2/25 BOARD MEETING the Board reviewed budget
reductions identified by the administration totaling
$4.34 million. The identified budget reductions are
designed to reduce expenditures while maintaining the
basic structure of our District. The reductions
would reduce the scope and scale of our programs, not
eliminate them. While none of the identified
reductions is desired, reductions must be considered
if the District is to remain fiscally responsible.
These reductions represent a potential loss of close
to 40.0 FTE staff positions, a substantial diminishing
of our outstanding program for students, and a substantial
diminishing of our support for staff. The reductions
will have an immeasurable impact on the morale of staff
and their sense of well being as valued employees serving
this community and our students.
AT THE MARCH 4 WORKSHOP, the Board will review the
budget reductions recommended by staff, students, parents,
and community members. Copies of all this material will
be sent to staff lounges and school/district offices
for public review.
AT THE MARCH 11 MEETING, the Board will take action
as needed on approving notices of possible layoff to
certificated staff, including all certificated administrators.
Prior to March 11, principals will meet personally and
privately with each teacher scheduled to receive a notice.
AT THE APRIL 8 MEETING, the Board will review the administration’s
recommendations on classified staffing reductions. Prior
to April 8, supervising administrators will meet personally
and privately with each classified employee impacted
by these proposed reductions.
AT THE APRIL 29 MEETING, the Board will take action
as needed on approving notices of layoff to impacted
classified staff, including classified administrators.
ADDITIONAL KEY DATES INCLUDE MAY 15 - final date for
approving certificated Reduction in Force, and June
24 - approval of the 2003-2004 school year budget.
At any time, after the State budget is approved, the
Board may take action to rescind layoff notices and
restore positions.
SUMMARY: We are facing the worst fiscal
crisis in the history of California and the history
of this district. Our great strengths as a district
are our commitment to excellence for students and our
commitment to working together to achieve our goals
and to solve our problems.
It is essential that we maintain these commitments.
We must maintain our sense of community and we must
reach out and support each and every person who may
be impacted by a notice of possible layoff.
We must maintain our focus on the real problem
— the Governor’s proposal to treat basic
aid districts (our kids and our staff) unfairly. Please,
continue sending those letters to Nation, Burton and
Davis. If you know someone who knows Governor Davis,
have that person contact the Governor directly (he does
accept calls from people he knows) to inform him of
the cost of his continued support of this provision
on staff, students, and our community.
The District will continue meeting with representatives
of the certificated, classified and management team
employee groups to review the impact of any budget decisions
on staff and to seek support for budget actions requiring
modifications to current employee contracts.
The Board and the Superintendent are also available
to meet with staff at staff meetings and/or parent groups.
Please contact Laurie (945-3720) to arrange the scheduling.
Please feel free to provide feedback. I appreciate
hearing your comments and suggestions blevinson@tuhsd.marin.k12.ca.us.
Please access our website, www.tamdistrict.org,
for ongoing updates and links to other key sites. And,
you are always welcome to attend our Board meetings.
The Trustees appreciate hearing from you, also.
|
 |
MORE
from the Superintendent’s Office on the fiscal
crisis
Fiscal crisis info (28-Feb-2003)
>> Letter to staff, parents & community
printer-friendly pdf
version of this letter
MORE info
(14-Feb-2003)
- Letter
to staff, parents & community
- Parent/Student/Community
Resident Response form
- Basic
Aid Backgrounder: Letter from Bolinas-Stinson Union
School District Trustee
ALL fiscal crisis
info…
KEY
CONTACTS IN SACRAMENTO
These are the telephone, fax and mailing addresses
of key officials. Faxed or US-mailed LETTERS rather
than emails are preferred.
Governor Gray Davis
c/o Michael Bustamante, Deputy Chief of Staff
State Capitol Bldg.
Sacramento, CA 95814
Ph: 916-445-2841
Fax: 916-445-4633
Secretary for Education Kerry Mazzoni
Office of the Secretary for Education
1121 L Street, Suite 600
Sacramento, CA 95814
Phone: 916-323-0611
Fax: 916-323-3753
Senator John Burton
State Capitol Bldg., Room 205
Sacramento, CA 95814
Ph: 916-445-1412
Fax: 916-445-4722
Assemblyman Joe Nation
State Capitol, Room 3013
Sacramento, CA 95814
Ph: 916-319-2006
Fax: 916-319-2106
Email addresses (note that faxed or US-mailed letters
are preferred):
Governor Davis: governor@governor.ca.gov
Joe Nation: joe.nation@asm.ca.gov
Senator Burton’s website: http://democrats.sen.ca.gov/senator/burton/
IMPORTANT DATES
March 4: BOARD WORKSHOP
The Board will review budget reductions recommended
by staff, students, parents, and community members.
March 6: SPEAKER
Secretary of Education Mazzoni will be speaking to Marin
County on Thursday evening, March 6, at 7:00pm in the
San Rafael High School auditorium.
March 11: BOARD MEETING
The Board will take action as needed on approving notices
of possible layoff to certificated staff, including
all certificated administrators.
April 8: BOARD MEETING
The Board will review the administration’s recommendations
on classified staffing reductions.
April 29: BOARD MEETING
The Board will take action as needed on approving notices
of layoff to impacted classified staff.
May 15: Final date for approving certificated
Reduction in Force
June 24: Approval of the 2003-2004
school year budget.
|